jueves, 7 de septiembre de 2017

Volume 214, October 2017, Pages 278–287


Current threats faced by Neotropical parrot populations

I. Berkunskya, P. Quillfeldtb, D.J. Brightsmithc, M.C. Abbudd, J.M.R.E. Aguilare, U. Alemán-Zelayaf, R.M. Aramburúg, A. Arce Ariash, R. Balas McNabi, T.J.S. Balsbyj, J.M. Barredo Barberenak, S.R. Beissingerl, M. Rosales, K.S. Bergn, C.A. Bianchin, E. Blancoo, A. Bodratip, C. Bonilla-Ruzq, E. Botero-Delgadillor, S.B. Canavellis, R. Caparrozt, R.E. Cepedaa, O. Chassotf, C. Cinta-Magallónq, K.L. Cocklebv, G. Danieleg, C.B. de Araujou, A.E. de Barbosav, L.N. de Mouraw, H. Del Castillox, S. Díazy, J.A. Díaz-Luquebu, L. Douglasaa, A. Figueroa Rodríguezab, R.A. García-Anleui, J.D. Gilardiz, P.G. Grillibt, J.C. Guixac, M. Hernándezad, A. Hernández-Muñozae, F. Hiraldoaf, E. Horstmanag, R. Ibarra Portilloah, J.P. Isacchai, J.E. Jiménezaj, L. Joynerak, M. Juarezg, F.P. Kacolirisg, V.T. Kanaanal, L. Klemann-Júnioram, S.C. Lattaan, A.T.K. Leeao, A. Lesterhuisap, M. Lezama-Lópezaq, C. Lugariniv, G. Marateog, C.B. Marinellia, J. Martínezar, M.S. McReynoldsas, C.R. Mejia Urbinaat, G. Monge-Ariasf, T.C. Monterrubio-Ricoau, A.P. Nunesav, FdP Nunesaw, C. Olacireguiax, J. Ortega-Arguellesay, E. Pacificoaf, L. Paganog, N. Politiaz, G. Ponce-Santizoi, H.O. Portillo Reyesba, N.P. Prestesar, F. Prestibb, K. Rentonbc, G. Reyes-Macedobd, E. Ringlerbe, L. Riveraaz, A. Rodríguez-Ferrarobx, A.M. Rojas-Valverdebf, R.E. Rojas-Llanosbg, Y.G. Rubio-Rochabh, A.B.S. Saidenbergbi, A. Salinas-Melgozabw, V. Sanzo, H.M. Schaeferbj, P. Scherer-Netobk, G.H.F. Seixasbl, P. Serafinibm, L.F. Silveirabi, E.A.B. Sipinskid, M. Somenzaribm, D. Susanibarbn, J.L. Tellaaf, C. Torres-Soverobo, C. Trofino-Falascoa, R. Vargas-Rodríguezbp, L.D. Vázquez-Reyesbq, T.H. White Jrbr, S. Williamsbs, R. Zarzax, J.F. Masellob
Abstract
Psittaciformes (parrots, cockatoos) are among the most endangered birds, with 31% of Neotropical species under threat. The drivers of this situation appear to be manifold and mainly of anthropogenic origin. However, this assessment is based on the last extensive consultation about the conservation situation of parrots carried out in the 1990s. Given the rapid development of anthropogenic threats, updated data are needed to strategize conservation actions. Using a population approach, we addressed this need through a wide-ranging consultation involving biologists, wildlife managers, government agencies and non-governmental conservation organizations. We gathered up-to-date information on threats affecting 192 populations of 96 Neotropical parrot species across 21 countries. Moreover, we investigated associations among current threats and population trends. Many populations were affected by multiple threats. Agriculture, Capture for the Pet Trade, Logging, each of them affected > 55% of the populations, suggesting a higher degree of risk than previously thought. In contrast to previous studies at the species level, our study showed that the threat most closely associated with decreasing population trends is now Capture for the local Pet Trade. Other threats associated with decreasing populations include Small-holder Farming, Rural Population Pressure, Nest Destruction by Poachers, Agro-industry Grazing, Small-holder Grazing, and Capture for the international Pet Trade. Conservation actions have been implemented on < 20% of populations. Our results highlight the importance of a population-level approach in revealing the extent of threats to wild populations. It is critical to increase the scope of conservation actions to reduce the capture of wild parrots for pets.
Keywords: ConservationEndangeredMacawParakeetPsittacidaePsittaciformes



miércoles, 3 de mayo de 2017



Comercio Internacional de Especies Silvestres Amenazadas y su influencia en el Desarrollo Sostenible

Marina Rosales Benites de Franco

Recibido el 11 de abril de 2016 - Aceptado el 18 de agosto de 2016

Resumen

Rosales, M. 2017. Comercio Internacional de Especies Silvestres Amenazadas y su influencia en el Desarrollo Sostenible. Ecosistemas 26(1): 116-120. Doi.: 10.7818/ECOS.2017.26-1.18


Texto completo: 
PDF 



viernes, 20 de enero de 2017


Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Volume 32, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages 97–107

Opinion

Is It Time for Synthetic Biodiversity Conservation?

  • 1 US Department of Agriculture, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
  • 2 Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
  • 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
  • 4 Arthropod Genetics Group, The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Woking, GU24 0NF, UK
  • 5 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
  • 6 Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, USA
  • 7 Biodesic, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
  • 8 J. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • 9 Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University, 440 Reynolds Medical Building, College Station, TX 77843, USA
  • 10 Revive and Restore, 2 Marina Boulevard Building A, San Francisco, CA 94123, USA
  • 11 Archipelago Consulting, Box 4750, Portland, ME, USA
  • 12 Department of Environmental Studies, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, 04112, USA
  • 13 Federico Villarreal National University, Avenida Oscar R. Benavides 450, Lima, Perú
  • 14 Environmental Law Centre, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Godesberger Allee 108-112, 53175 Bonn, Germany
  • 15 ZedX Inc., Bellefonte, PA 16823, USA
  • 16 IUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534716301975

miércoles, 12 de octubre de 2016

Weber Earth Science & Environmental Engineering
July 2016, Vol. 2 (3).
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research Article
International Trade in Vicuna Fiber and Its Influence on the Conservation Status of Populations of Peru.
Marina Rosales Benites de Franco 1*, Abel Jesús Mejía Marcacuzco2, César Arguedaz Madrid3, Miguel Llellish 4
1Professor de la Facultad de Ingeniería Geográfica,
Ambiental y Ecoturismo de la Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal.
2Professor del Doctorado en Ingeniería Ambiental de la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina.
3Director de la Escuela de Ingeniería en Ecoturismo de la Facultad de Ingeniería Geográfica,
Ambiental y Ecoturismo de la Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal.
4Investigator Asociado del Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.
 
Accepted 28th September, 2016; Available Online 29th September, 2016.


Abstract:
International trade of vicuna fiber (Vicugna vicugna) and its products were made by the countries of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru and the United Kingdom. Peru was the main exporter of fiber, recorded significant volumes from the inclusion of their populations in Appendix II of CITES in the decade of the nineties. It exported 82% of the total quantities, 47.319 kg of fiber corresponding to 241.423 sheared vicunas for the period 1975-2011. Ecological sustainability of vicuna populations for the study period was 0.6261, showing that international trade fiber of vicuña populations have had positive influences on its conservation condition with a middle value. However, these values must take into account the negative drivers vicuña populations, such as poaching, main driver. For that, it is need to prioritize the management of vicuna populations in its habitats than manage in captivity, seeking to diversify economic options to offer at the market, based on goods and services generated by Andean ecosystems, integrating vicuña population conservation, its habitats with landscape approach.



lunes, 6 de junio de 2016

International trade - biodiversity - benefit sharing

Weber Economics & Finance
May 2016, Vol. 2 (3), ISSN:2449-1662
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research Article
International Trade of Peccaries pelts and benefit sharing

Accepted 27th May, 2016; Available Online 31th May, 2016.


Abstract:
International trade of tanned leather of Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758 "Collared Peccary" and Tayassu peccary Link, 1795 "White-lipped Peccary", has had a low social sustainability indicator 0.3519 and a medium level economic sustainability indicator 0.5248. Furthermore, this influence for social and economic sustainability which has led inequitable benefit sharing in trade chain. Therefore, the fifty million dollars generated in the marketing chain (1986 - 2011) had no influence on the welfare of the affected regions and the participation of economic benefits, which is not significant for native communities or local people. Corresponding to the total generated 7% to hunters in economic benefits, 12% to the local gatherer, 15% to the city gatherer, 62% to the industrial and exporters and 4% to the National Wildlife Authority. This inequitable of benefits distribution does not encourage the conservation and sustainable use of P. tajacu and T. pecari populations in Peru.

View Abstract ]                        [ Full Text: PDF ]

This article has been published in Weber Economics & Finance (ISSN:2449-1662). Please find 
details of the Publication below.

WESEE is currently index in Google Scholar, Gale Centage Learning, CAS, Serial Solutions,
 Ulrich Periodical.

******************************************************************************
ARTICLE TITLE: International Trade of Peccaries pelts and benefit sharing

AUTHORS: Dr. Marina Rosales Benites de Franco 

OTHERS:Vol.2(3),  Article ID wef_176, 587-598, 2016.



*******************************************************************************

sábado, 19 de marzo de 2016

International Trade of Peccaries and Conservation Status.
Marina Rosales Benites de Franco
Faculty of Geographic Engineering, Environment and Ecotourism
Federico Villarreal University 

Accepted 13th March, 2016; Available Online 19th March, 2016.


Abstract:
Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758 "Collared Peccary" and Tayassu pecari Link, 1795 " White-lipped Peccary" populations of Peru have low ecological sustainability to maintain international trade of their skins from livelihood, subsistence hunting. This economic activity is not managed with sustainable approach. The international trade of their skins adversely affects its conservation status, considering also the cumulative effects caused by deforestation, pollution from mining and oil areas. It is important to recognize that peccary’s populations and their habitats have not been managed in the field. It is proposed to categorize the Peruvian populations of P. tajacu and T. pecari in Vulnerable situation, manage subsistence hunting through areas of communal management in situ, promoting governance of indigenous and local populations and fill the gaps in their policies and management of these populations by regulations.




ARTICLE TITLE: International Trade of Peccaries and Conservation Status

AUTHOR: Dr. Marina Rosales Benites de Franco

OTHERS: Vol.1(5) 2016, Article ID wesee_167, 519-532, 2016.