jueves, 29 de diciembre de 2022

Convention on Biological Diversity

 

Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework 2022 - 2030

  

Marina Rosales Benites de Franco[1]

 

The Kunming – Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was approved in the fifteenth meeting – Part II of Biological Diversity Convention that was held in Montreal, Canada, 7-19 December 2022.

This framework has a big challenge to balanced and enhanced implementation of all provisions of the Convention including its three objectives. Also, it should be used as a strategic plan for the implementation of the Convention and its Protocols, over the period 2022–2030. The Conference of the Parties should present at its sixteenth meeting the update implementation of the framework.

The society has more awareness the vital importance biodiversity conservation as fundamental part of human life; however, the logic importance is maintaining the economic prosperity for future generations to live in healthy ecosystems. These thirty years, we learned the nature as biodiversity is the key to improve decisions making in different global challenge as climate change and accomplish global sustainable development goals to 2030. Furthermore, we understood the fundamental importance of assessments develops by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) to build and develop policies at global, regional, and national levels.

All biodiversity problems are related with the underlying causes, the indirect drivers of change which underpinned by social, economic and government decisions. These underlying causes are responsible of the direct drivers of change in nature, ecosystems, as changes in land and sea use, direct exploitation of organisms, climate change, pollution, and invasion of alien species.

The framework searches to transform all the drivers of change biodiversity conservations through theory of change. In this regard, the purpose of the framework aims to catalyze, enable and galvanize urgent and transformative action by Governments, subnational and local governments, and with the involvement of all of society to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, to achieve the outcomes it sets out in its vision, mission, goals and targets, and the framework is action- and results-oriented, and aims to guide and promote at all levels the revision, development, updating, and implementation of policies, goals, targets, national biodiversity strategies and actions plans, and to facilitate monitoring and review of progress at all levels, in a more transparent and responsible manner. It is important to highlight the framework acknowledges the human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment; gender equality and empowerment of women and girls and reducing inequalities; and the principle of intergenerational equity which aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs and to ensure meaningful participation of younger generations in decision making processes at all levels.

This document aims to present the vision, mission goals and targets of the Kunming – Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework 2022 – 2030. It is based on CBD/COP/15/L.25[2].The targets are This document aims to present the vision, mission goals and targets of the Kunming – Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework 2022 – 2030. It is based on CBD/COP/15/L.25. The targets are related to reducing threats to biodiversity, meeting people’s needs through sustainable use and benefit-sharing and tools and solutions for implementation and mainstreaming.

Vision 2050.

The vision of the framework is a world of living in harmony with nature where: “By 2050, biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people.”

 

Mission 2030.

The mission of the framework for the period up to 2030, towards the 2050 vision is: To take urgent action to halt and reverse biodiversity loss to put nature on a path to recovery for the benefit of people and planet by conserving and sustainably using biodiversity and ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the use of genetic resources, while providing the necessary means of implementation.

 

Kunming-Montreal Global Goals for 2050

The framework has four long-term goals for 2050 related to the 2050 Vision for Biodiversity.

GOAL A

The integrity, connectivity and resilience of all ecosystems are maintained, enhanced, or restored, substantially increasing the area of natural ecosystems by 2050;

Human induced extinction of known threatened species is halted, and, by 2050, extinction rate and risk of all species are reduced tenfold, and the abundance of native wild species is increased to healthy and resilient levels;

The genetic diversity within populations of wild and domesticated species, is maintained, safeguarding their adaptive potential.

GOAL B

Biodiversity is sustainably used and managed and nature’s contributions to people, including ecosystem functions and services, are valued, maintained, and enhanced, with those currently in decline being restored, supporting the achievement of sustainable development for the benefit of present and future generations by 2050.

GOAL C

The monetary and non-monetary benefits from the utilization of genetic resources, and digital sequence information on genetic resources, and of traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, as applicable, are shared fairly and equitably, including, as appropriate with indigenous peoples and local communities, and substantially increased by 2050, while ensuring traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources is appropriately protected, thereby contributing to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, in accordance with internationally agreed access and benefit-sharing instruments.

GOAL D

Adequate means of implementation, including financial resources, capacity-building, technical and scientific cooperation, and access to and transfer of technology to fully implement the Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework are secured and equitably accessible to all Parties, especially developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, progressively closing the biodiversity finance gap of 700 billion dollars per year, and aligning financial flows with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the 2050 Vision for Biodiversity.

 

Kunming-Montreal 2030 Global Targets

 

1. Reducing threats to biodiversity.

TARGET 1

Ensure that all areas are under participatory integrated biodiversity inclusive spatial planning and/or effective management processes addressing land and sea use change, to bring the loss of areas of high biodiversity importance, including ecosystems of high ecological integrity, close to zero by 2030, while respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities,

TARGET 2

Ensure that by 2030 at least 30 per cent of areas of degraded terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine ecosystems are under effective restoration, to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, ecological integrity, and connectivity.

TARGET 3

Ensure and enable that by 2030 at least 30 per cent of terrestrial, inland water, and of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, are effectively conserved and managed through ecologically representative, well-connected and equitably governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, recognizing indigenous and traditional territories, where applicable, and integrated into wider landscapes, seascapes and the ocean, while ensuring that any sustainable use, where appropriate in such areas, is fully consistent with conservation outcomes, recognizing and respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, including over their traditional territories.

TARGET 4

Ensure urgent management actions to halt human induced extinction of known threatened species and for the recovery and conservation of species, in particular threatened species, to significantly reduce extinction risk, as well as to maintain and restore the genetic diversity within and between populations of native, wild and domesticated species to maintain their adaptive potential, including through in situ and ex situ conservation and sustainable management practices, and effectively manage human-wildlife interactions to minimize human-wildlife conflict for coexistence.

 

TARGET 5

Ensure that the use, harvesting and trade of wild species is sustainable, safe and legal, preventing overexploitation, minimizing impacts on non-target species and ecosystems, and reducing the risk of pathogen spill-over, applying the ecosystem approach, while respecting and protecting customary sustainable use by indigenous peoples and local communities.

TARGET 6

Eliminate, minimize, reduce and or mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species on biodiversity and ecosystem services by identifying and managing pathways of the introduction of alien species, preventing the introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species, reducing the rates of introduction and establishment of other known or potential invasive alien species by at least 50 per cent, by 2030, eradicating or controlling invasive alien species especially in priority sites, such as islands.

TARGET 7

Reduce pollution risks and the negative impact of pollution from all sources, by 2030, to levels that are not harmful to biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, considering cumulative effects, including: reducing excess nutrients lost to the environment by at least half including through more efficient nutrient cycling and use; reducing the overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half including through integrated pest management, based on science, taking into account food security and livelihoods; and also preventing, reducing, and working towards eliminating plastic pollution.

TARGET 8

Minimize the impact of climate change and ocean acidification on biodiversity and increase its resilience through mitigation, adaptation, and disaster risk reduction actions, including through nature-based solution and/or ecosystem-based approaches, while minimizing negative and fostering positive impacts of climate action on biodiversity.

 

2. Meeting people’s needs through sustainable use and benefit-sharing.

 

TARGET 9

Ensure that the management and use of wild species are sustainable, thereby providing social, economic and environmental benefits for people, especially those in vulnerable situations and those most dependent on biodiversity, including through sustainable biodiversity-based activities, products and services that enhance biodiversity, and protecting and encouraging customary sustainable use by indigenous peoples and local communities.

TARGET 10

Ensure that areas under agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry are managed sustainably, in particular through the sustainable use of biodiversity, including through a substantial increase of the application of biodiversity friendly practices, such as sustainable intensification, agroecological and other innovative approaches contributing to the resilience and long-term efficiency and productivity of these production systems and to food security, conserving and restoring biodiversity and maintaining nature’s contributions to people, including ecosystem functions and services .

TARGET 11

Restore, maintain, and enhance nature’s contributions to people, including ecosystem functions and services, such as regulation of air, water, and climate, soil health, pollination and reduction of disease risk, as well as protection from natural hazards and disasters, through nature-based solutions and/or ecosystem-based approaches for the benefit of all people and nature.

TARGET 12

Significantly increase the area and quality and connectivity of, access to, and benefits from green and blue spaces in urban and densely populated areas sustainably, by mainstreaming the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and ensure biodiversity-inclusive urban planning, enhancing native biodiversity, ecological connectivity and integrity, and improving human health and well-being and connection to nature and contributing to inclusive and sustainable urbanization and the provision of ecosystem functions and services.

TARGET 13

Take effective legal, policy, administrative and capacity-building measures at all levels, as appropriate, to ensure the fair and equitable sharing of benefits that arise from the utilization of genetic resources and from digital sequence information on genetic resources, as well as traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, and facilitating appropriate access to genetic resources, and by 2030 facilitating a significant increase of the benefits shared, in accordance with applicable international access and benefit-sharing instruments.

 

3. Tools and solutions for implementation and mainstreaming.

 

TARGET 14

Ensure the full integration of biodiversity and its multiple values into policies, regulations, planning and development processes, poverty eradication strategies, strategic environmental assessments, environmental impact assessments and, as appropriate, national accounting, within and across all levels of government and across all sectors, in particular those with significant impacts on biodiversity, progressively aligning all relevant public and private activities, fiscal and financial flows with the goals and targets of this framework.

TARGET 15

Take legal, administrative or policy measures to encourage and enable business, and in particular to ensure that large and transnational companies and financial institutions:

(a) Regularly monitor, assess, and transparently disclose their risks, dependencies and impacts on biodiversity, including with requirements for all large as well as transnational companies and financial institutions along their operations, supply and value chains and portfolios;

(b) Provide information needed to consumers to promote sustainable consumption patterns;

(c) Report on compliance with access and benefit-sharing regulations and measures, as applicable;

In order to progressively reduce negative impacts on biodiversity, increase positive impacts, reduce biodiversity-related risks to business and financial institutions, and promote actions to ensure sustainable patterns of production.

TARGET 16

Ensure that people are encouraged and enabled to make sustainable consumption choices including by establishing supportive policy, legislative or regulatory frameworks, improving education and access to relevant and accurate information and alternatives, and by 2030, reduce the global footprint of consumption in an equitable manner, including through halving global food waste, significantly reducing overconsumption and substantially reducing waste generation, in order for all people to live well in harmony with Mother Earth.

TARGET 17

Establish, strengthen capacity for, and implement in all countries in biosafety measures as set out in Article 8(g) of the Convention on Biological Diversity and measures for the handling of biotechnology and distribution of its benefits as set out in Article 19 of the Convention.

TARGET 18

Identify by 2025, and eliminate, phase out or reform incentives, including subsidies, harmful for biodiversity, in a proportionate, just, fair, effective, and equitable way, while substantially and progressively reducing them by at least 500 billion United States dollars per year by 2030, starting with the most harmful incentives, and scale up positive incentives for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.

TARGET 19

Substantially and progressively increase the level of financial resources from all sources, in an effective, timely and easily accessible manner, including domestic, international, public and private resources, in accordance with Article 20 of the Convention, to implement national biodiversity strategies and action plans, by 2030 mobilizing at least 200 billion United States dollars per year, including by:

(a) Increasing total biodiversity related international financial resources from developed countries, including official development assistance, and from countries that voluntarily assume obligations of developed country Parties, to developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, to at least US$ 20 billion per year by 2025, and to at least US$ 30 billion per year by 2030;

(b) Significantly increasing domestic resource mobilization, facilitated by the preparation and implementation of national biodiversity finance plans or similar instruments according to national needs, priorities and circumstances;

(c) Leveraging private finance, promoting blended finance, implementing strategies for raising new and additional resources, and encouraging the private sector to invest in biodiversity, including through impact funds and other instruments;

(d) Stimulating innovative schemes such as payment for ecosystem services, green bonds, biodiversity offsets and credits, benefit-sharing mechanisms, with environmental and social safeguards

(e) Optimizing co-benefits and synergies of finance targeting the biodiversity and climate crises,

(f) Enhancing the role of collective actions, including by indigenous peoples and local communities, Mother Earth centric actions22 and non-market-based approaches including community based natural resource management and civil society cooperation and solidarity aimed at the conservation of biodiversity

(g) Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency and transparency of resource provision and use;

TARGET 20

Strengthen capacity-building and development, access to and transfer of technology, and promote development of and access to innovation and technical and scientific cooperation, including through South-South, North-South and triangular cooperation, to meet the needs for effective implementation, particularly in developing countries, fostering joint technology development and joint scientific research programmes for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and strengthening scientific research and monitoring capacities, commensurate with the ambition of the goals and targets of the framework.

TARGET 21

Ensure that the best available data, information and knowledge, are accessible to decision makers, practitioners and the public to guide effective and equitable governance, integrated and participatory management of biodiversity, and to strengthen communication, awareness-raising, education, monitoring, research and knowledge management and, also in this context, traditional knowledge, innovations, practices and technologies of indigenous peoples and local communities should only be accessed with their free, prior and informed consent,23 in accordance with national legislation.

TARGET 22

Ensure the full, equitable, inclusive, effective and gender-responsive representation and participation in decision-making, and access to justice and information related to biodiversity by indigenous peoples and local communities, respecting their cultures and their rights over lands, territories, resources, and traditional knowledge, as well as by women and girls, children and youth, and persons with disabilities and ensure the full protection of environmental human rights defenders.

TARGET 23

Ensure gender equality in the implementation of the framework through a gender-responsive approach where all women and girls have equal opportunity and capacity to contribute to the three objectives of the Convention, including by recognizing their equal rights and access to land and natural resources and their full, equitable, meaningful and informed participation and leadership at all levels of action, engagement, policy and decision-making related to biodiversity.


[1] https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e6d3/cd1d/daf663719a03902a9b116c34/cop-15-l-25-en.pdf

[2] https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e6d3/cd1d/daf663719a03902a9b116c34/cop-15-l-25-en.pdf

 

miércoles, 16 de febrero de 2022

Ambiente y Sociedad: los desafíos de la biodiversidad en el mundo y en el Perú al 2050



 Ambiente y Sociedad: los desafíos de la biodiversidad en el mundo y en el Perú al   2050.

Resumen: El Convenio sobre Diversidad Biológica, instrumento jurídico internacional, tiene como objetivo realizar acciones globales para la conservación y uso sostenible de los componentes de la diversidad biológica, y la participación de beneficios de los usos derivados de los recursos genéticos. En este sentido, el presente artículo se propone realizar un balance de los logros, retos y desafíos de este acuerdo global y desarrollar propuestas para los nuevos objetivos estratégicos y metas cruciales que ayuden a revertir la pérdida acelerada de especies y el colapso de ecosistemas.

La metodología que se ha usado ha sido la de evaluar las estrategias desde 1993 hasta 2020 del Convenio sobre Diversidad Biológica en sus dos planes estratégicos mediante la revisión de los programas temáticos y de los protocolos de Cartagena y Nagoya. Los logros no han sido significativos a nivel de ecosistemas e integración en las políticas públicas de todos los sectores y la participación privada.

El artículo intenta hacer una serie de valoraciones críticas en torno al debate actual expresado en el Marco Mundial de Diversidad Biológica Posterior a 2020 en los ámbitos relacionados con la restauración ecológica, la conectividad de los ecosistemas, la gestión de los procesos y funciones ecológicas, la gobernanza local y la eliminación de los incentivos perversos con las transformaciones de las políticas.

La situación de biodiversidad en el Perú necesita mucho apoyo por parte del Estado y de la ciudadanía, por este motivo se darán, para finalizar, una serie de ideas sobre ella y se propondrán temas de  discusión y debate.

Palabras clave: Biodiversidad, Retos globales, Ambiente, Sociedad, Perú.


CASTRO A. Y M. ROSALES (2022). «Ambiente y sociedad: los desafíos de la  biodiversidad en el mundo y en el Perú al 2050». En Castro A. y M. I. Merino-Gómez.Desafíos y perspectivas de la situación ambiental en el Perú. En el marco de la conmemoración de los 200 años de vida republicana. Lima: INTE-PUCP, p. 14-45. https://inte.pucp.edu.pe/publicaciones



domingo, 13 de febrero de 2022

IPBES y las Áreas Naturales Protegidas



El presente documento tiene como objetivo establecer la relación del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica y la Plataforma Intergubernamental de Ciencia y Normativa sobre Diversidad Biológica y Servicios de los Ecosistemas (IPBES), los avances de la plataforma en el conocimiento de la biodiversidad para la formulación de políticas, los avances de las áreas naturales protegidas a nivel del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (Sinanpe) del Perú y la aplicación de las recomendaciones de la IPBES en la gestión de las áreas naturales protegidas.

http://sis.sernanp.gob.pe/biblioteca/?publicacion=2552


Autores:

Marina Rosales Benites de Franco : Especialista en Diversidad Biológica

 Edgar Eduardo Vicuña : Responsable de la UOF de Gestión de la Información

Ada R. Castillo Ordinola : Especialista en Políticas de Áreas Naturales Protegidas

Rosaura Y. Minaya Callirgos : Especialista en Políticas de Áreas Naturales Protegidas


Diseño y Diagramación : UOF de Imagen Institucional y Comunicación Social

Cuidado de Edición : Luis Benavides Parra

Primera edición, enero 2022

© Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (Sernanp)

Calle Los Petirrojos 355, urbanización El Palomar, San Isidro, Lima

Teléfono: 01 717 75 00

Correo: sernanp@sernanp.gob.pe

SERNANP

Hecho el Depósito Legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú N.o 2022-00742

Impreso en el Perú / Piru llaqtapi qillqasqa / Printed in Peru

viernes, 28 de agosto de 2020

 

Novum, Volumen 2, Número 10, p. 333-362, 2020. ISSN electrónico 2357-4933. ISSN impreso 0121-5698.

CAMBIOS TRANSFORMACIONALES PARA ALCANZAR LOS OBJETIVOS DE LA VISIÓN PARA LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLÓGICA AL 2050

 

Transformational changes to reach vision objectives regarding biological diversity in 2050

 

Fecha de recibido: 27 / 04 / 2020 - Fecha de aceptación: 02 / 06 / 2020

 

Marina Rosales Benites de Franco. Doctora en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible.  Docente de la Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal y de la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Integrante del grupo de investigación en Ecología, Manejo, Conservación de la Biodiversidad y de los Servicios de los Ecosistemas. Perú. Correo electrónico: mrosales@unfv.edu.pe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-8339

Jesús Abel Mejía Marcacuzco. Doctor en Ingeniería Hidráulica. Docente de la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Integrante del grupo de investigación en Medio Ambiente. Perú. Correo electrónico: jabel@lamolina.edu.pe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9070-3898

Lily O. Rodríguez. Doctora en Ecología de la Universidad de París, Bióloga de la Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina-UNALM. Investigadora en Instituto de Economía de la Alimentación y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Bonn. Perú. Correo electrónico: lrodriguez@cima.org.pe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-879X

Augusto José Antonio Lázaro Castro Carpio. Doctor en Estudios Latinoamericanos. Pontificia Universidad Peruana Católica del Perú – PUCP. Perú. Correo electrónico: acastro@pucp.pe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-2839

Napoleón Ambrocio Barrios. Doctor en Economía. Docente de la Universidad Ricardo Palma y de la Universidad de Lima – Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Económicas. Integrante del Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, microeconomía y econometría. Perú. Correo electrónico: napoab@yahoo.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-9232

Marilyn Aurora Buendía Molina. Ingeniera Zootecnista con Maestría en Nutrición egresado de la Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina. Especialista en edición de revistas científicas de la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Perú. Correo electrónico: marilynbuendia@lamolina.edu.pe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-0778

 

Cómo citar este artículo

Rosales B.F, M., Mejía M, J.A., Rodríguez, L.O, Castro C, A.J.A.L., Ambrocio B, N., y Buendía M, M.A. (2020). Cambios transformacionales para alcanzar los objetivos de la visión para la diversidad biológica al 2050. NOVUM, 2(10), 333 - 365.

 

Resumen

 

Objetivo: con este artículo se busca recomendar la implementación, a nivel mundial, de cambios transformacionales o transformadores necesarios para alcanzar los objetivos de la visión para la diversidad biológica al 2050. Metodología:  se analizaron los resultados de evaluaciones globales sobre la diversidad biológica como la “Evaluación Mundial sobre la Diversidad Biológica y los Servicios de los Ecosistemas” de IPBES” y las “Perspectivas del Medio Ambiente Mundial, GEO 6: Planeta sano, personas sanas” del PNUMA, entre otros, y artículos científicos relacionados, en el marco general de la teoría del cambio (ToC). Hallazgo: los resultados de aplicación de los documentos de planificación mundial, para detener las tasas de extinción aceleradas de especies y de ecosistemas y del desarrollo sostenible, plasmadas en las Metas de Aichi de la Estrategia para la Diversidad Biológica al 2020 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible al 2030, muestran logros débiles. Conclusión: se requieren cambios transformadores drásticos para alcanzar los objetivos de la visión para la diversidad biológica al 2050 que se complementen con acciones como reducción de la inequidad, la eliminación de las externalidades negativas para el capital natural, la buena gobernanza, la implementación de incentivos, reducciones tributarias, impuestos como estrategias económicas, el fomento al comercio justo y la economía circular. Palabras clave: Transformación; Gestión; Diversidad biológica; Metas de Aichi.

   

Abstract

 

Object: The purpose of this article is to recommend the implementation of transformational or transforming changes in a global scale, needed to reach the objectives of biological diversity vision as of 2050. Methodology: Results derived from global tests about biological diversity, like the IPBES’ “Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services”, as well as PNUMA’s “Global Environment Outlook GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People”, among others, were examined. Besides, some scientific results related to the general frame of Theory of Change. Finding: Results from the application of the documents of global planning, to halt accelerated rates of extinction in species, ecosystems and sustainable development, appearing in the Aichi Biodiversity Targets for 2020 and the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030, show weak results. Conclusion: There exist drastic transformation changes that will be needed to reach the goals traced in the vision for biological diversity in 2050 and these will need additional actions as reduction of inequity, deletion of negative externalities in benefit of natural capital, good governance, implementation of incentives, tributary reductions, taxes as economic strategies, promotion for fair commerce and circular economy. Keywords: Transformation; Management; Biological diversity; Aichi targets.

 

https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/novum/article/view/89645/76205

 

lunes, 27 de enero de 2020

The 2019 review of IPBES and future priorities: reaching beyond assessment to enhance policy
impact


Anne-Sophie Stevance, Peter Bridgewater, Selim Louafi, Nicholas King, T. Douglas Beard Jr., Albert S. Van Jaarsveld, Zenda Ofir, Ryo Kohsaka, Karen Jenderedijan, Marina Rosales Benites, Kalemani Joseph Mulongoy, Kalpana Lalitkumar Chaudhari, James Painter & Andrew Meter


To cite this article: Anne-Sophie Stevance, Peter Bridgewater, Selim Louafi, Nicholas King, T. Douglas Beard Jr., Albert S. Van Jaarsveld, Zenda Ofir, Ryo Kohsaka, Karen Jenderedijan, Marina Rosales Benites, Kalemani Joseph Mulongoy, Kalpana Lalitkumar Chaudhari, James Painter & Andrew Meter (2020) The 2019 review of IPBES and future priorities: reaching beyond assessment to enhance policy impact, Ecosystems and People, 16:1, 70-77, DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2019.1702590

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1702590

ABSTRACT

The Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is an independent scientific body focused on assessing the state of the world’s ecosystem services and biodiversity. IPBES members agreed in 2017 that a review of the Platform’s first work programme should be undertaken by an independent panel examining all aspects of IPBES’ work – including implementation of the four functions of IPBES; policies, operating principles and procedures; governance structure and arrangements; communication, stakeholder engagement and partnerships; and funding mechanisms. The review found that for IPBES to have its anticipated transformative impact: 
● All four functions of IPBES (i.e. assessment, knowledge generation, policy support, capacity building), with better communication, must be significantly strengthened, integrated and delivered together;
● The policy aspects of IPBES work need to be strengthened and greater emphasis needs to be placed on the co-design and co-production of assessments;
● A more strategic and collaborative approach to stakeholders is needed; and,
● IPBES must develop a more sustainable financial base.
Given those changes, IPBES, as an embryonic boundary organization, can become the key influencing organization in the global landscape of biodiversity and ecosystem services organizations, helping thus to catalyze transformative change in the relationship between people and the rest of nature.

ARTICLE HISTORY:  Received 17 May 2019 Accepted 5 December 2019

EDITED BY: Patricia Balvanera 

KEYWORDS: Science–policy interface; boundary organization; science evaluation; biodiversity; ecosystem
services; policy; nature’s contributions to people
LIBRO DE RESÚMENES
CONGRESO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS EN ÁREAS NATURALES PROTEGIDAS
26-28 de setiembre 2018




Editado por:



Ph.D. Lily Rodríguez - Coordinadora del Comité Editor

Ph.D. Javier Ñaupari - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM)

Dra. Marina Rosales - Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (SERNANP) /
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal (UNFV)

Dr. José Alberto Iannacone - Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal (UNFV) /
Universidad Ricardo Palma (URP)

Mg.Sc. Marilyn Aurora Buendía - Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM)

Blga. Ada Castillo - Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (SERNANP)

Dr. Augusto Castro - INTE – Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú 


Libro:  http://sis.sernanp.gob.pe/biblioteca/?publicacion=1928

























martes, 2 de julio de 2019

International vicuna fiber trade and its benefit sharing


Abstract

Objective: this research article is expected to show the influence of international trade in vicuna fibre for social and economic sustainability, within the framework of shared benefits and welfare for the Andean peasant communities. Methodology: the research used social and economic indicators to determine the social and economic sustainability of Andean communities. In addition, the economic benefits of the trade agreements and Free on board - FOB values of the international trade of vicuna fibre for the period 1995 – 2011. Finding: it was found that approximately US$ 13 million generated from the FOB value in that period has no social welfare in the affected regions. Similarly, the international trade in vicuna fibre had a low level influence (0.0792) on its economic welfare as did the US$ 21 million generated from the FOB value. Conclusion: international trade in vicuna fibre had no influence on the social or economic welfare of peasant communities. The increase in human resources at these competitive levels in education, technological knowledge, access to health systems and nutrition will be a step forward in the sustainable development of Andean culture and moral values. Keywords: Vicuna fiber; Agricultural economics; Rural Development; Sustainable Development.

NOVUM, revista de Ciencias Sociales Aplicadas
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Manizales.
Facultad de Administración
Julio – diciembre de 2019

Edición completa: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/novum/issue/viewIssue/5115/1477
Artículo: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/novum/article/view/77140/71390

Cómo citar este artículo:
Rosales Benites de Franco, M., Mejía Marcacuzco, J.A., Ambrocio Barrios, N., Iannacone Oliver, J.A., Lleellish Juscamayta, M. (2019). International vicuna fiber trade and its benefit sharing. NOVUM, 2(9), 9 - 28.

miércoles, 19 de junio de 2019

Annex :IPBES/7/INF/18

Review of the first work programme of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)


Review report
01 February 2019







Review Panel: Peter Bridgewater, Australia (co-chair); Marina Rosales, Peru (co-chair); Douglas Beard, USA; Kalpana Latikumar Chaudhari, India; Albert S. van Jaarsveld, Austria/South Africa; Karen Jenderedijan, Armenia; Nicholas King, South Africa; Ryo Kohsaka, Japan; Selim Louafi, France; Kalemani Joseph Mulongoy, Democratic Republic of Congo/Canada.



The International Science Council was selected by the Bureau and the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel of IPBES as external professional organization to coordinate the review of IPBES at the end of its first work programme that was conducted by the review panel.

Lead coordination: Anne-Sophie Stevance (ISC)
Methodological support and expert advice: Zenda Ofir (independent evaluation specialist)
Overall support: Nora Papp (ISC)

https://www.ipbes.net/system/tdf/ipbes-7-inf-18_review.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=29859


miércoles, 14 de noviembre de 2018

Chapters of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for the Americas of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES/6/INF/4/Rev.1).


Chapter 6: Options for governance and decision-making across scales and sectors.


Coordinating  Lead Authors: Fabio R. Scarano (Brazil), Keisha Garcia (Trinidad and Tobago), Antonio Diaz-de-Leon (Mexico)

Lead Authors: Helder Lima Queiroz (Brazil), Vanesa Rodríguez Osuna (Bolivia & USA), Luciana C. Silvestri (Argentina), Cristóbal F. Díaz M. (Cuba), Octavio Pérez-Maqueo (Mexico), Marina Rosales B. (Peru), Dalia M. Salabarria F. (Cuba), Ederson A. Zanetti (Brazil)

Fellow: Juliana S. Farinaci (Brazil)

Review Editors: Gustavo A.B. Fonseca (Brazil/USA), Laura Nahuelhual M. (Chile)




To be cited as:
Scarano, F. R., Garcia, K., Diaz-de-Leon, A., Queiroz., H. L., Rodríguez Osuna., V., Silvestri, L. C., Díaz M., C. F., Pérez-Maqueo, O., Rosales B., M., Salabarria F., D. M., Zanetti, E. A., and Farinacci, J. S. Chapter 6: Options for governance and decision-making across scales and sectors. In IPBES (2018): The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for the Americas. Rice, J., Seixas, C. S., Zaccagnini, M. E., Bedoya-Gaitán, M., and Valderrama, N. (eds.). Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, pp. 644 - 721.



lunes, 19 de febrero de 2018

Guidelines for Species Conservation Planning
IUCN Species Survival Commission’s
Species Conservation Planning Sub-Committee

Version 1.0




Published by: IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland

Copyright: © 2017 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Citation: IUCN – SSC Species Conservation Planning Sub-Committee. (2017). Guidelines for Species Conservation Planning. Version 1.0. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xiv + 114 pp.
ISBN:978-2-8317-1877-4

Marina Rosales with others as Guidelines reviewers

DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.18.en

Access: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2017-065.pdf

















jueves, 8 de febrero de 2018

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT OUTLOOK - GEO-6
REGIONAL ASSESSMENT FOR
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN






Copyright © 2016, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Job No: DEW/1966/NAISBN: 978-92-807-3546-8


Suggested citation: 

UNEP 2016. GEO-6 Regional Assessment for Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. 

Credits © Maps, photos, and illustrations as specified.

Marina Rosales Benites de Franco as Contributing Authors Chapter 2: State and Trends. 2.5 Biodiversity
Marina Rosales Benites de Franco as Reviewers GEO 6 - LAC

Access: 
http://web.unep.org/geo/assessments/regional-assessments/regional-assessment-latin-america-and-caribbean



jueves, 1 de febrero de 2018

Routledge Ethics of Tourism

Tourism Experiences And Animal Consumption

Contested Values, Morality and Ethics

Edited by Carol Kline



List of figures List of tables

Notes on contributors

Acknowledgements

Reviewer acknowledgements

1.            Introduction: animal ethics, dietary regimes, and the consumption of animals in tourism
ERIK COHEN

2.            Feasting on friends: whales, puffins, and tourism in Iceland
EDWARD H. HUIJBENS AND NÍELS EINARSSON

3.            Consuming Shangri-la: orientalism, tourism, and eating Tibetan savory pigs
TAO ZHOU AND BRYAN GRIMWOOD

4.            Who pays for our cheap meat? the impact of modern meat production on slaughterhouse workers: considerations for tourists
BECKY JENKINS

5.            Examining the correlation between tourism and the international trade of peccary: ethical implications
MARINA ROSALES BENITES DE FRANCO AND JESÚS ABEL MEJÍA MARCACCUZCO

6.            Eating insects and tourism: ethical challenges in a changing world
ROBERT TODD PERDUE

7.            Making a meal of it: a political ecology examination of whale meat and tourism
BENEDICT E. SINGLETON

8.            Barbecue tourism: the racial politics of belonging within the cult of the pig
DEREK H. ALDERMAN AND JANNA CASPERSEN

9.            Fat duck as foie gras? Axiological implications of tourist experiences
ELISE MOGNARD

10.         The ethical implication of tourism on guinea pig production: the case of Cuenca, Ecuador
JOSÉ PRADA-TRIGO

11.        Agritourism providers’ reflections on post-carbon treatment of the wild white-tail deer
  CHRISTINA T. CAVALIERE AND RACHAEL VISCIDY

12.       The metaphysical background of animal ethics and tourism in Japan
  YOKO KITO

13.        Consuming   the   king   of   the  swamp:  materiality  and  morality in South Louisiana  alligator  tourism 
             ADAM KEUL

14.       Yulin Lychee and Dog Meat Festival: a shift in focus
   HANNAH BROWN

15.        Abstracting animals through tourism
   CAROL KLINE




Notes on contributors
Jesús Abel Mejìa Marcacuzco is an agricultural engineer with a Master’s Degree in Water Resources Engineering from the Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina-UNALM, Peru. Master in Hydrology obtained at the Free University of Brussels, Belgium. Doctor of Hydraulic Engineering obtained at the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Expert in Water Resources and Environment related with ecosystems services.
Derek Alderman is Professor of Geography at the University of Tennessee, where he teaches and conducts research on the cultural and historical geographies of the American South. His specific areas of interest include African American history and memory, the politics of southern heritage and identity, and the tourism landscape as an arena for struggles over social justice and racial belonging. Dr. Alderman is a co-founder of the RESET (Race, Ethnicity, and Social Equity) Initiative and the (co)author of over 110 peer-articles, chapters, and other essays published in journals such as Current Issues in Tourism, Journal of Heritage Tourism, Journal of Travel Research, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Tourism Geographies, Tourism Recreation Research, and Tourist Studies.
Hannah Brown is a solicitor specializing in animal advocacy and litigation. She is the Legal and Project Manager for the Association of Lawyers for Animal Welfare (a UK-based organization of lawyers working for the benefit of the animal protection community) and leads a number of projects seeking to better animal protection law through legislative and judicial engagement. Hannah also lectures internationally on the legal status of animals and animal protection law.
Janna Caspersen is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Geography at the University of Tennessee, after having received an MA in Geography from East Carolina University and a BA in Geography from the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire. Her interests include sustainable tourism, memory studies, civil rights, social justice, qualitative geographic information systems, and social media’s role within the geographies of memory.
Christina T. Cavaliere is an environmental social scientist and international sustainable development specialist focused on linking tourism and bio-cultural conservation. She currently serves as an Assistant Professor within the programs of Hospitality and Tourism Management and Sustainability at Stockton University. Her research interests include tourism and climate change, local economies, sustainable agriculture and ecogastronomy, permaculture, agritourism, critical thinking for sustainability, and community re-development. Christina earned a PhD from the University of Otago in New Zealand. She has designed and implemented numerous international field trainings, conservation, and research projects and has published in several A-ranked journals.
Erik Cohen is the George S. Wise Professor of Sociology (emeritus) at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He has conducted research in Israel, Peru, the Pacific islands, and, since 1977, Thailand. He has published more than 200 publications on a wide range of topics. His recent work focused on the sociological theory of tourism, space tourism, ethnic tourism in Southeast Asia, and animals in tourism. Cohen is a founding member of the International Academy for the Study of Tourism and the recipient of the UN World Tourism Organization’s Ulysses Prize for 2012.
Níels Einarsson is an anthropologist and Director of the Stefansson Arctic Institute in Akureyri, Iceland. His main professional interests include the social, cultural, and environmental dimensions of marine resource governance; climate change, whale watching, and whaling in Iceland, and North Atlantic Arctic sustainability and social change issues. He has led and participated in numerous international research and scientific assessment projects with a focus on the circumpolar region, including co-editing the first Arctic Human Development Report, and as co–principal investigator on the current ARCPATH (www.ncoe-arcpath.org) and GREENICE (https://greenice.b.uib.no/) projects, with the primary goal of investigating environmental and social change in Arctic coastal communities.
Bryan Grimwood is Associate Professor in the Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies at the University of Waterloo. His research analyzes human–nature relationships and advocates social justice and sustainability in contexts of tourism, leisure, and livelihoods. Trained as a human geographer and engaged scholar, Bryan specializes in tourism and Indigenous Peoples, tourism ethics and responsibility, northern landscapes, and outdoor experiential education. His research is informed theoretically by relational perspectives of nature and morality and draws on diverse qualitative methodologies and principles of community-based and participatory research. Since joining UWaterloo as a faculty member in 2011, Bryan has grounded his research in settings ranging from Arctic communities and protected areas to urban outdoor programs and green spaces.
Edward H. Huijbens is a geographer, scholar of tourism, and professor at the school of business and science, University of Akureyri. Edward works on tourism theory, innovation, landscape perceptions, marketing strategies, health and wellbeing, and polar tourism. Edward is the author of articles in several scholarly journals in both Iceland and internationally and has co-edited Technology in Society/Society in Technology (2005, University of Iceland Press), Sensi/able Spaces: Space, Art and the Environment (2007, Cambridge Scholars Press), The Illuminating Traveller (2008, University of Jyväskylä), Tourism and the Anthropocene (2016, Routledge) and Icelandic Tourism (Forlagið, 2013).
Rebecca Jenkins holds an LL.B Degree from Trinity College Dublin School of Law and an LL.M Degree from Lewis & Clark Law School. Rebecca is the first Aquatic Animal Law Initiative Fellow at the Center for Animal Law Studies at Lewis & Clark Law School. Rebecca has been published in Lewis & Clark’s Animal Law Journal and has presented at the Oxford Center for Animal Ethics’ Summer School. Rebecca’s research interests include food law and policy, critical race and gender studies, intersectional approaches to animal law, and aquatic animal law.
Adam Keul serves as the director of the program in Tourism Management and Policy at Plymouth State University in Plymouth, New Hampshire. He is trained as a human geographer and his research focuses on the production of tourism spaces at the confluence of land and water. He has written about tourism and geography covering a variety of topics, including animals and tourism, tourism in wetlands, the politics of coastal access, and resource development in the globalized Arctic. Throughout his research, Keul applies critical theories addressing political economies and ecologies.
Yoko Kito is Associate Professor of Ethics and Theology at the National Institute of Technology Nagano College (Japan). Her research is mainly in the area of the thought of Paul Tillich, the thought of the Kyoto school, political philosophy, animal ethics, and Christian ethics. Her publications include Animal Ethics and Feminism in Japan, Time and Space in the Thought of Paul Tillich: The Relation of Ontology and History, Keiji Nishitani and Paul Tillich: About History as Kū and History as Kairos, Friedlaender und Tillich: Zur Interpretation von Kants Religionsphilosophie, and The Concept of Transcendence in Charles Taylor: Religion and the Political.
Carol Kline is an Associate Professor of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Appalachian State University in the Department of Management. Her research interests focus broadly on tourism planning and development and tourism sustainability but cover a range of topics such as foodie segmentation, craft beverages, agritourism, wildlife-based tourism, animal ethics in tourism, tourism entrepreneurship, niche tourism markets, and tourism impacts to communities.
Elise Mognard is a Senior Lecturer in Tourism at Taylor’s University (Malaysia). After receiving her PhD in sociology from Université de Toulouse, CERTOP-CNRS (Toulouse, France) – of which she still is an associate member – she joined Taylor’s University (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) and is involved in the International Associated Laboratory (LIA) “Food Studies: Food, Cultures and Health.” Her research focuses broadly on the socio-anthropology of food. More specifically, she is interested in the regulation of the relations between humans and animals in food, food controversies and ethics, and cosmopolitan food socialization.
Rob Todd Perdue is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at Appalachian State University and a faculty affiliate with the Center for Appalachian Studies at the same institution. He received his PhD from the University of Florida. He teaches courses on Environmental Sociology, Social Inequality, Sociological Theory, and Peace Studies. His research centers on environmental inequality, with the goal of highlighting how topics that have traditionally fallen outside the purview of environmental social scientists are in need of sustained engagement. As such, he has published research that connects topics as diverse as breastfeeding, artificial intelligence, and strip coal mining to environmental and social inequality. His current work attempts to link environmental and criminal justice by examining the ecological impacts of mass incarceration in the United States.
José Prada-Trigo works as Associate Professor in the Faculty of Architecture, Urbanism, and Geography at the University of Concepción, Chile. He holds a PhD in Geography and Tourism and has participated in different national and international research projects. He has won some research grants and prizes and has published several books and papers about city, territory, and tourism. At present, he is conducting two projects about tourist motivations and immaterial cultural heritage, tourists, and territory.
Marina Rosales Benites de Franco is a Professor at Federico Villarreal National University, Lima. She is a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Commission on Environmental, Economic, and Social Policy Theme on Environment, Macroeconomics, Trade, and Investment, the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas and the IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management. She is a Doctor on Environment and Sustainable Development, and an expert on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems services.
Benedict E. Singleton is a postdoctoral researcher at the Swedish Biodiversity Centre at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. He has recently begun a project examining how the embodied experiences of nature feed into the social construction of biodiversity, utilizing the case of marine mammal science. In December 2016, he defended his PhD thesis in environmental sociology entitled “From the Sea to the Land Beyond: Exploring Plural Perspectives on Whaling.” He first became interested in the global whaling debate as a social anthropology undergraduate at Queen’s University Belfast. An experienced researcher, he has carried out fieldwork in settings as diverse as Zambia, Jamaica, the UK, Belgium, and Malta. Falling within the broad field of political ecology, he has diverse research interests on the theory of socio-cultural viability; science, technology, and society studies; and international development.
Rachael Viscidy is an undergraduate student at Stockton University in the Hospitality and Tourism Management Studies program. Her interests include culinary arts, community development, local foods, and international relations. She has experience in the food and beverage industry and in non-governmental organization event management. Rachael plans to continue to study sustainable tourism and would like to pursue a career in international development.
Tao Zhou is a PhD student studying tourism in the Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies at the University of Waterloo, Canada. His research applies the theory of post-colonialism to tourism study, specifically in the region of Tibet. In particular, his research studies how Tibetans are marginalized and silenced in tourism development. Another research interest is to examine the representation of Indigenous culture within the policy and planning landscape of Indigenous tourism in Canada.

First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

© 2018 selection and editorial matter, Carol Kline; individual chapters, the contributors The right of Carol Kline to be identified as the author of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.

Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.

British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record has been requested for this book

ISBN: 978-1-138-29161-4 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-315-26518-6 (ebk)


Typeset in Times New Roman by Apex CoVantage, LLC